Boats 4-7 going to Melbourne Australia. In two weeks another 5 and in four weeks another 6 of which 2 are for New Zealand sailors who will compete in the Australian Nationals. So 18 DNA's will compete in the Australian Nationals, which will be a great regatta with al the big names present. Landy, Glenn and Stevie will use their special and latest rigs and in Europe sailors will follow the races with a huge interest.
Tuesday, 28 September 2010
Saturday, 25 September 2010
Friday, 24 September 2010
Best A-class video sofar
No DNA's in it as the DNA was not born in 2009. The video shows the grace, the smoothness, the speed, the thrill and the fun of sailing an A-Class cat. A-Class is on its way to become the singlehand sailing class. No longer 'the best kept secret in the sailing word' (Seahorse magazine) but the ideal boat for the clubsailor, the weekend racer and America's Cup helmsmen.
Apparent wind sailing is king, no more slow boating. The era of the 'half boats' is over.
It is light, it is fast, it is fun. You can do it too!
Apparent wind sailing is king, no more slow boating. The era of the 'half boats' is over.
It is light, it is fast, it is fun. You can do it too!
A-Cat promotion by others
Nice blog with an article about the A-class. Nice effort of Charles of the SACA (Swiss A-Cat Association).
Veersemeer regatta 2010
Three shots of Jaap Staakenbroek last Saturday. Photographer unkown.
Jaap uses a Saarberg mast and a Landenberger Maxx sail.
Monday, 20 September 2010
Tech talk: PJ on DNA materials and DNA construction
When we started the project we had a clear vision on the quality of build:
We wanted to produce topboats, just under minimum weight, which would keep their stifness and strength for many years even after years of racing in tough conditions.
The Marstrom Tornado’s were our example of ‘best-quality-for-money' 'best-buy’ racing boats.
Compared to other Olympic classes that boat was (and still is) an unique product.
We all know the stories of top teams sailing more than one Olympics on the same boat.
We asked our self the following questions:
- What would it take to achieve such quality standard in the A class?
- How to build a strong and durable boat, even when used in though conditions?
- How to build a boat that transforms the image of nice-but-fragile boats into an image of great plug-and-play lively racing machines?
75 kgs is the mininimum all up sailing weight. Aftter substracting the weight for the rig, appendage, fittings and trampoline, we are left with the ideal weight for a bare but painted platform of 40-42 Kgs.
- How to construct a platform on target, which is as stiff, as strong and as durable as possible?
Basically the stiffer the boat, the faster (less loss of energy).
Extreme stiffnes has usually one downnside , that’s durability. When you make the construction a bit more forgiving , then certain flex can reduce peak loads, which increases durability. It's a tricky engineering area, because we did not have an AC budget to do the necessary strain gauge testing .
Fortunately we have plenty of experience in sailing A class boats of all different constructions. So the design decisions were made intuitively but based on a thorough empirical base. We felt that flexing boats were not durable at all, and that stiff boats were more durable as long the materials were in the right spot .
- What are the most flexing areas in an A class platform?
Three main areas: flexing in hulls, flexing in the beams (both torsion and bending) and panel deflection of the hull shell itself .
There is an optimal balance between the beam stiffness and the hull stifness especially at the conjunction of these parts.
In the DNA design we tried to achieve the most integrated construction possible. We chose not to use‘beampockets‘ as most builders normally do, but designed special shaped beams, which exactly fitted into the hull, which made it possible to bond and laminate the beams directly to the hull skins and bulkheads, which saved weight and increased overall stiffness.
For building the hull shells we decided to use the best practice building method : 100 C curing carbon pre-preg combined with a 10 mm Nomex Core.
Nomex honeycomb has high panel stiffness and good processing capabilities.
A 10 mm nomex core weighs 480 grs / m2 . For comparison a common used 80 kgs/ m3 pvc Core of 6 mm weighs the same , but the higher thickness of the honeycomb gives a quadratic increase of stiffness,which means 2,7 X higher panel stiffness if the same skins are used. You can't beat that .
Another advantage over foam is the higher sheer stiffness of the core.
Everything stiffer leads to less deflection, less fatigue and increased longevity.
Choosing nomex honey comb as core is a choice for extra process control as well :
It is of paramount importance that the fine honeycomb cell walls are bonded 100 % to the skins. The resin in the prepreg skins should form small fillets to all cell walls during curing. This sounds simple, but you need the exact right resin type and content, the right resin viscosity, the right curing schedules and the right vacuum pressure. Besides perfect core bonding, we were looking for an excellent, pinhole free outside surface quality
and a 100 % porosity free inner skin. Finally we tried to create an impact resistant outer skin, to prevent the pinching of the outerskin by small stones and shells.
All this requirements may sound logical and straightforward, but getting the exact right materials is normally quite a challenge. By closely co-operating with Holland Composites' long time prepreg supplier we werre able to develop a custom formulated pre-preg.
Pretty unique, because most pre-preg companies are not interested in developing a custom product for such a small application area as building multihulls.
Our prepreg has exellent bonding and flow characterics, with results even Holland Composites did not see in 20 years of advanced composites building.
The outer skin is 300 grs sqm 3K standard modulus twill weave cloth pre-preg , the inner skins is a 200grs sqm twill weave pre-preg which results in a good impact vs overall stiffness performance .
On certain spots the outer skin is reinforced with UD tapes of different weights and some lightweight surface layer of 48 grs sqm E glass weave .
On high stress areas the skin thickness is increased up to 6 times the standard skin eg. areas around the beams , trapezing area, shroud attachment points, rudders and daggerboard bearing areas.
The hulls are oven cured at 1 bar vacuum pressure and a staged curing cycle leving the parts on ‘flow temperature’ for some hours before kicking it to 100 C for the final cure .
A special designed and CNC cutted assembly frame is used for the assembly of the hull shells, beams, bulkheads, subdecks, deck frames and daggerboard cases into the DNA platform
After the bonding of the parts, the platform is postcured at 50 C for 24 hrs to make sure the secondary bondings are 100% too.
Next article on this Blog by PJ will dig deeper into the construction method, and design of the curved daggerboards, rudder blades and rudderstocks.
Friday, 17 September 2010
From shed to factory
Hull moulds, one of the 4 ovens and the cutting table
Hulls in the oven
Rudder moulds
Daggerboards ready to be finished
The daggerboard moulds
Designing a new A-class is one thing. Producing is a whole other ballgame. Fortunately we incorporated our production filosophy in our design process from the start. That's why we were able to scale up production when demand increased so dramatically.
Building pre-preg boats has many advantages but you also need high tech tooling. We had to build ovens, buy freezers and make temperature resistant carbon moulds.
We choose to build the number of moulds to be able to build a complete boat parallel. So a double set of hull moulds (4), 2 sets of daggerboard moulds, two beam moulds (fore and rear beam) and two sets of rudder moulds.
With that amount of moulds we can either build one boat a week or theoretically one boat a day (without paint).
A pre-preg boat has to be painted afterwards which is more expenisve but als gives a better finish and it can be renewed after some years of extensive sailing.
Without PJ's background in composites and without the support of his company Holland Composites this would never have been possible.
In another posting PJ will explain his choice of materials.
Tuesday, 14 September 2010
AC vs A-cat
From the America's Cup site:
AC72 approximate dimensions:
LOA - 22.0 meters (72 feet)
Beam - 14.0 meters (46 feet)
Displacement - 7,000 kilograms (15,500 pounds)
Wingsail area – 300 square meters (3,229 square feet)
The catamaran will be able to fly a hull in 5 to 6 knots true windspeed. The target boatspeeds in winds under 10 knots were set at 1.2 times the true windspeed upwind and 1.6 times true windspeed downwind.
This performance is pretty close to a modern A-cat. In 10 knots we do 12 knots and downwind 16 knots. (or are the target speeds maybe in VMG?, in winds above 10 knots the AC will be faster and we will see speedbursts opver 30 knots (one of the design parameter))
The wingsail area is not that big. To have the same sailarea/weight ratio as an A-cat you have to double the sailarea by adding jibs and gennakers.
The wingsail area is not that big. To have the same sailarea/weight ratio as an A-cat you have to double the sailarea by adding jibs and gennakers.
The whole thing is pretty straight forward and certainly not a an Alinghi style lake racer. The design issues are; who builds the most powerful hulls and who builds the thinnest wing.
My predictions: The winning hulls will be closer to a DNA than to the latest C-class designs. The best wing will not be the most powerful wing but the most efficient wing. (VMG is king not sheer power)
In medium to strong breeze conventional rigs might be competitive too.
In medium to strong breeze conventional rigs might be competitive too.
The balance issue Alinghi had will not be that big this time because in this boxrule we will not see hulls with overhang.
If big boats do not outperform small boats, I prefer smaller boats.
Though would really like to see a Dutch Challenge. We can build it.
Monday, 13 September 2010
America's Cup goes A-cat!
Copyright © 2010 Golden Gate Yacht Club
The 34th America's Cup will be sailed in wingmasted catamarans. This is good news for all multihull enthousiasts and for the A-class in particular. Many A-cat sailors are active in the America's Cup syndicates both as sailor and/or designer.
Glenn and James have set an example for the other teams by building their skills by sailing small cats and especially the most refined ones the A-cats. The most amazing of the last America's cup for me was not the sheer size of these beasts but the fact that both James and Loick could sail such a machine as if it was an A-class or F18.
James, Glenn and Luc will sail on DNA's which will attract others to the class as well. Even America's Cup teammembers have their spare time and love to go sailing when they are ready at 'the office'. Especially if they see how much fun their helmsmen and sailing coaches are having by playing with the fun boats. So our finest go America's Cup and America's Cup finest go A-class.
Saturday, 11 September 2010
40!
40 was our magic number when we started our ARC/DNA project. 40 boats have been sold now and will be delivered in 2010 (AUS, USA, NED, GER, ESP, UK, SUI). We are delighted about this and wish to thank all our partners and especially our first customers who bought the DNA when it only existed on paper.
We thank Roeland for his grant debut, Stevie for his vice-worldchampionship and his incredible come back race, we thank Chris for doing do well in Switzerland and Holland and his thrill with the new boat, Sjoerd for doing so well in Germany.
We wish to thank Roeland,Michel, Jaap, Rene, Jons for their trust in us and their support during the development of the boat and the firm. We thank Wouter and his late wife Lea for their perseverance and craftmanship. Jons for his effort in mounting the boats. Martin for the assistance in producing the daggerboards and rudders. Sjoerd for his assistance in building the first hull halves.
We wish to thank HOCO (Reinout, Ron, Sven, Sander, Bas, Nico, Koop, Mohammed, Joey, Erik) for the support, effort and incredible waterjet cutter. Jan Ilmer for his feedback and his models. Rudo for his superb modelling and designing. Jan van der Staaij for painting the appendage models. Monique and Erwin for excellent painting of the platforms and for keeping deadlines. Felix for the tramp design, Micky for his covers and his belief in our project. MartinVanzulli for his enthousiasme on his blog. And last but not least we like to thank our partners and children for their support and understanding.
It all started in autumn last year with a test sail of the Nikita. We were impressed how much quicker that boat was compared to our Flyer 2 which we took with us as the reference boat. We tried to buy two boats but Nils was fully booked and could not guarantee a boat in time. We contacted Glenn to buy two ASG3 instead but he couldn't deliver either and the rest is history.
The combined experience of Arno and PJ led to the DNA which is more than just a new boat, it is philosophy with integrates boat design, composite materials engineering, lean manufacturing, business strategy, class promotion and sailor's passion into the new benchmark for the class.
Keep on sharing your passion with us and let's have fun on the water,
Arno & PJ
Friday, 10 September 2010
Refitting boats, solution or wasted money?
We do sell refit kits for transforming straight board boats into curved board boats.
A kit contains two boards, two daggerboards cases and two sliders to make the boards adjustable.
Cost aproximately 1900 euros including covers for the daggerboards but excluding the labor for the upgrade.
Does it make any sense to invest so much money in your boat?
It depends on what you expect. It will improve the perfomance of some boats (The Tool, Marstrom) significantly and will have less impact on performance on a Flyer 1, 2 or ASG3.
Though it will make some boats faster it will not make these boats competitive in the big championships. We have seen some refitted Tools, which were quite good but not as good as the new curved board boats (Nikita, DNA).
It makes sense to refit a boat if you do not want to sell your boat and prefer to have an upgrade.
If you can sell your boat, the upgrade makes only sense if it adds 2500 euros to the value of the boat.
It is my experience that sailing new boats and selling these after 1 or 2 years is the most economic thing to do. The only problem is the initial investment which can be significant especially for younger sailors.
Upgrading older boats does not add a lot of value, that's why the depriciation of a new boat is often less than the depreciation of an old boat plus the upgrading costs and( the annual new sail).
The paradox of the new carbon boats is that the boats became more expensive but the cost of sailing actauallly declined. (more durable, higher reselling prices)
The transition from straight boards to curved boards can be a good thing for the class; the improved performance of the A-class catamarans will attract people from other classes and the availlability of reasonably priced secondhand boats will attract new sailors as well.
Tuesday, 7 September 2010
DNA light weather performance
pic by Megan Brewin
Pic by Fredirico Rafaelli
Most people have seen that the boat is fast in medium and strong breeze, but how does it in the light stuff?
In Cesenatico we had sometimes very light stuff and Stevie did great but not better than Glenn.
In those conditions the rig really matters, the more power you get from the rig the better you go especially downwind. Both Glenn and Stevie did use very powerful rigs. Both boats have the fore beam behind the middle of the boat and both helmsman where clearly in front of the fore beam while drifting downwind. The DNA has quite some volume and can be sailed without wake that way.
In theory the DNA has some what more wetted surface due to its square bottom and transom, but in reality if you can get the transom out of the water is the same as the Tool or other high voulme boats and still better than a Flyer 1 or 2. In the ligt stuff you have to pull up the boards downwind, the boat is slow if you don't. If you do it the boat wil glide very smooth over the water with no wake and no noise.
Upwind you would expect that the straight boards boats are quicker, but we have not seen that to our surprise and that of others. Once you pop a hull the boat is fast. Due to its flat bottom the boat has a bigger resistance for going down and therefore you can pop a hull just a bit earlier than on the 'older' designs.
If you sit or hike out in front of the shrouds, the transom is out of the water and boat is longitudinal stable and feels very light. The lack of noise is quite amazing, so little wave drag and low induced drag.
We are not sure what the best setting is for the boards, if you add rake you will get more lift (and height) but that will be cause more drag as well. Somewhat less rake is less drag which should be faster theoratically but we have not seen that in races. What makes a difference is pull up the windward board once you can foot to the first mark.
The ligh weather performance is one of the reasons we did not further reduce the amount of rocker. The boat has less rocker than the Nikita, but also has a bigger overall volume to compensate for that.
The wind limit as stated in the Championships Rules has gone up from 4 knots to 5 knots. In 5 knots you certainly can pop a hull upwind so no more drifting in the big Championships.
Sunday, 5 September 2010
Sjoerd Hoekstra beats Bob Baier in German Open
Last week Sjoerd finished third behind Bob on his Tool in the Dutch Open. This weekend Sjoerd convincingly beat Bob on PJ's DNA.
After the first day Bob was leading Sjoerd by one point. That day Bob had a slight edge upwind with his Ashby Maxx sail, but Sjoerd was already quicker downwind. Sunday Sjoerd scored three bullets in 3-4 bft where he had the upperhand both upwind and downwind.
Other people complimented Sjoerd with his boatspeed and Sjoerd replied 'I just couldn't help it.'
The DNA scoreds with this result the third consecutive win in a National Championship; Chris the Swiss and Dutch Open and Sjoerd the German Open.
Next year will be tough for everyone with so many people on a DNA.
Full results at:
http://www.ycso.de/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=298&Itemid=230
Remarks on VDAC forum:
http://vdac.okbb.de/viewtopic.php?f=2&p=594&sid=33b79737ee606d9a29590e56542e82ad
Unfortunately no pics of the event
Full results at:
http://www.ycso.de/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=298&Itemid=230
Remarks on VDAC forum:
http://vdac.okbb.de/viewtopic.php?f=2&p=594&sid=33b79737ee606d9a29590e56542e82ad
Unfortunately no pics of the event
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





